.
Feedback

Cook County Courts Electronics Ban Starts Jan. 14

Cell phones won’t be allowed in courts throughout the county.

 

Cell phones, laptops and tablets won’t be allowed in Cook County courthouses starting Monday per an order by the county’s chief judge who wants to make courthouses safer and protect people testifying in court.

Cook County Chief Judge Timothy Evans’s order takes effect Monday, but there will be a three-month grace period.

The Circuit Court of Cook County and the Cook County Sheriff’s Department will remind people entering a courthouse that communication devices are prohibited, Evans said in a statement released Friday. “It will be strongly suggested devices remain in the car,” he said.

The Circuit Court is working to find a place for people using public transportation to put their devices, he said. If a person can’t leave electronics in a car during the grace period, they can keep it as long as it is off. If anyone is caught using it, they could face charges.

Under the ban, prospective jurors, lawyers, people on official business, former judges, licensed attorneys, police officers, government employees, vendors and the media will be exempt.

Anyone caught with electronics that make audio or video recordings, including cell phones, laptops and tablets, could be charged with contempt of court once the grace period ends on April 15.

“We want to do everything we can to ensure that justice is properly done by preserving the integrity of testimony and maintaining court decorum,” Evans said. “We understand this may be an inconvenience to some, but our primary goal is to protect those inside our courthouses and perhaps save lives in the process.”

Judges informed Evans of concerns that people attending court proceedings were using cell phones to photograph witnesses, judges, jurors and prospective jurors, Evans said. People also appeared to be texting testimony to witnesses waiting their turn to testify outside the courtroom while others were attempting to stream live to media comments by judges from the bench, he said.

The ban is intended to send a strong message to gang members and others who attempt to intimidate witnesses, jurors and judges that such acts will not be allowed, he said. It does not affect efforts in the state to bring cameras and televise trials.

Thirteen courthouses are effected by the ban. The Richard J. Daley Center Courthouse is exempt since the ban will affect only courthouses where criminal matters are heard, the release stated. Courthouses affected are:

The George N. Leighton Criminal Court Building at 2600 S. California Ave., Chicago

The Cook County Juvenile Center, 1100 West Hamilton Ave., Chicago

The Domestic Violence Courthouse, 555 West Harrison St., Chicago

The Second Municipal District Skokie Courthouse, 5600 Old Orchard Road, Skokie

The Third Municipal District Rolling Meadows Courthouse, 2121 Euclid Road, Rolling Meadows

The Fourth Municipal District Maywood Courthouse, 1500 Maybrook Drive, Maywood

The Fifth Municipal District Bridgeview Courthouse, 10220 S. 76th Ave., Bridgeview

The Sixth Municipal District Markham Courthouse, 16501 S. Kedzie Parkway, Markham

5555 W. Grand Ave., Chicago (First Municipal District criminal branches 23 and 50)

2452 W. Belmont Ave., Chicago (First Municipal District criminal branches 29 and 42)

155 W. 51st St., Chicago (First Municipal District criminal branches 34 and 48)

727 E. 111th St., Chicago (First Municipal District criminal branches 35 and 38)

3150 W. Flournoy St., Chicago (First Municipal District criminal branches 43 and 44)

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Arlington Heights Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
joanne_engstrom June 14, 2013 at 11:17 am
Amen! And to think The Orchard Evangelical Free Church wants to raze 8 neighborhood homes to buildRead More a parking lot? Another loss of revenue for the village if these 8 homes get demolished.
Cati Jones June 16, 2013 at 05:29 pm
yes, despite the fact that property values have taken a hit in this economy, there has been NORead More change in the AH property taxes> Question: what are our political representatives doing about this?
Sarah June 18, 2013 at 10:58 pm
no new police $$$$tation is needed stop the wastful spanding
Burt June 11, 2013 at 10:45 pm
The residents of Arlington Heights are aging and have no money we cannot raise any more taxes. IfRead More anything cut the size of the force
Bob Ruffatto June 13, 2013 at 08:26 am
I think that the police department does need a building. New national standards require separateRead More ventilation systems for prisoners to reduce unhealthy exposure. Also, new standards require "hardened" facilities to assure uninterrupted protection during emergencies. In addition, there are many more issues that after review seem reasonable. However, we don't need a new 71,000 square foot building which would rival in size, our current village hall - a building many call a Taj Mahal. The current process started on the wrong foot and wasted money. Three qualified consultants submitted bids and yet the contract was awarded to high-bidder. This has already wasted thousands of taxpayer dollars. Hopefully the new Board and Mayor will rein in the excessive spending and design. We have reason for hope. There is now a qualified and fiscally conservative architect on the Board. At the same time, it would nice to see if the Police could share some of the largely unused village hall. Doing so, would be a win-win for taxpayers.
Sarah June 15, 2013 at 09:45 pm
ask the Police who work there , what is more important their pensions being funded , or someRead More """ air quality bs "" I would give a shower with a garden hose to any law braker anytime , some deodorant , hell I would even wash their cloth , meanwhile giving them nice pink pants and t-shirt the current police station is sufficient , but there must be a interest in building one and it is not a residents interest I am talking about - figure it out ( $$$$$$$)